Project

General

Profile

Journal Club » History » Version 30

Robert Suhada, 01/16/2013 01:36 PM

1 1 Robert Suhada
h1. Journal Club
2 1 Robert Suhada
3 20 Robert Suhada
*Time:* Weekly - Friday, 14:00 - 15:30
4 17 Robert Suhada
*Place:* Seminar room - I13 - upstairs
5 2 Robert Suhada
6 12 Robert Suhada
7 12 Robert Suhada
{{toc}}
8 12 Robert Suhada
9 2 Robert Suhada
10 29 Robert Suhada
h2. Next paper - *18.01.12* 
11 27 Robert Suhada
12 30 Robert Suhada
h2. The Formation of Massive Cluster Galaxies
13 30 Robert Suhada
14 30 Robert Suhada
Conor L. Mancone, Anthony H. Gonzalez, Mark Brodwin, Spencer A. Stanford, Peter R. M. Eisenhardt, Daniel Stern, Christine Jones
15 30 Robert Suhada
(Submitted on 8 Jul 2010)
16 30 Robert Suhada
We present composite 3.6 and 4.5 micron luminosity functions for cluster galaxies measured from the Spitzer Deep, Wide-Field Survey (SDWFS) for 0.3<z<2. We compare the evolution of m* for these luminosity functions to models for passively evolving stellar populations to constrain the primary epoch of star formation in massive cluster galaxies. At low redshifts (z < 1.3) our results agree well with models with no mass assembly and passively evolving stellar populations with a luminosity-weighted mean formation redshift zf=2.4 assuming a Kroupa initial mass function (IMF). We conduct a thorough investigation of systematic biases that might influence our results, and estimate systematic uncertainites of Delta zf=(+0.16-0.18) (model normalization), Delta zf=(+0.40-0.05) (alpha), and Delta zf=(+0.30-0.45) (choice of stellar population model). For a Salpeter type IMF, the typical formation epoch is thus strongly constrained to be z ~2-3. Higher formation redshifts can only be made consistent with the data if one permits an evolving IMF that is bottom-light at high redshift, as suggested by van Dokkum et al 2008. At high redshift (z > 1.3) we also witness a statistically significant (>5sigma) disagreement between the measured luminosity function and the continuation of the passive evolution model from lower redshifts. After considering potential systematic biases that might influence our highest redshift data points, we interpret the observed deviation as potential evidence for ongoing mass assembly at this epoch.
17 30 Robert Suhada
18 30 Robert Suhada
http://arXiv.org/abs/1007.1454v1
19 30 Robert Suhada
20 30 Robert Suhada
Votes: *1*
21 5 Robert Suhada
22 2 Robert Suhada
h2. Paper pool
23 7 Robert Suhada
24 17 Robert Suhada
!arrow-right.png!  *[[paper_pool|Click here to add papers you'd like to discuss.]]*
25 14 Shantanu Desai
26 17 Robert Suhada
!arrow-right.png! *[[paper_pool_2|Click here to add interesting papers that are too off-topic or controversial for the journal club.]]*
27 11 Robert Suhada
28 1 Robert Suhada
h2. Video talks and lectures
29 10 Robert Suhada
30 17 Robert Suhada
!arrow-right.png!  *[[talks_pool|Click here to add links to talks or lectures you recommend.]]*
31 17 Robert Suhada
32 1 Robert Suhada
h2. Previous papers
33 18 Robert Suhada
34 19 Robert Suhada
!arrow-right.png!  *[[jclub_history|Click here to see that papers we have already discussed.]]*
Redmine Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux